Since there isn't going to appear to be any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can some of you give a place to begin with this mixture and things to think about when Functioning this Load up?
They've got done identically for me. Like Everybody else I rushed to have the more recent SC Model but have now switched back. Ideally you want about 100% loading density. In case you have enough case capability with the H4831(prolonged) that you are most likely much better off.
It really is likely that no further more discussion is necessary, by which circumstance we suggest beginning a completely new thread. If however you really feel your reaction is needed you are able to nevertheless do so.
I have had a couple of rifles that fouled seriously undesirable. Finding every one of the copper out was a true PIA right up until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
The one difference as I realize it is that the SC was intended to get the job done by powder measures far better (which it does). The lengthier grains tend not to feed perfectly in any way in certain steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Any load data to aid that? My very first imagined is it isn't about to burn off all of the way and velocities is going to be gradual and all over the place. May very well be a nice fireworks Display screen!
Any one loading 7mm Rem Mag with h4831sc H4831sc? How are the final results, any data you are able to share? Also needs to mention I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I wish to exam out, When you've got data on that at the same time.
Like reported previously mentioned, same stuff. All that differs is the dimensions in the kernels. I h4831sc did listen to someplace that they're going to only make the SC Down the road. I do not know if that is certainly real or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC due to the fact that's what I located in the eight lb jug and it really works.
With the smoother movement properties arrives extra uniform cost weights, when the person grains orient more compactly, creating greater loading density.
Why would I point out this? Just what is my place? I am unsure that there is a actual legitimate level apart from what's well-known with most hasn't been well-liked with me in the slightest degree in these situations. Do I just Use a powder jinx or some thing? Only to tell you about how crazy I actually am, tomorrow I am range tests a friends new .
So glad your obtaining more forms of powder back in. Now you need to get primers back in inventory and reloaded can start off reloading all over again.. just indicating
It's been a little bit, but h4831 vs h4831sc I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 five shot team right now. It is just a little slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Thanks for the recommendation, It is excellent to realize that I've bought options when 1 or another powder is dried up.
I do know the H4831SC offers an improved load density But I do think I have sufficient room in my situation for the traditional H4831.
The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you are viewing larger velocities acquired with that powder, versus what you've observed While using the IMR stuff.